• About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
  • Home
  • World
  • Diplomatic
  • Sports
    • Cricket
  • National
  • Business
  • Crime & Justice
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Environment
    • CPEC
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Diplomatic
  • Sports
    • Cricket
  • National
  • Business
  • Crime & Justice
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Environment
    • CPEC
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Trilateral diplomacy reshaping South Asia’s strategic chessboard

by Sub News
August 25, 2025
Trilateral diplomacy reshaping South Asia’s strategic chessboard
Share on WhatAppShare on XShare on Facebook

By Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal

For a long time, Afghanistan has knowingly or unknowingly entangled Pakistan in a web woven largely at the behest of India. Since the inception of Pakistan in 1947, Afghanistan has rarely missed an opportunity to exploit vulnerabilities, often aligning itself with New Delhi in order to exert pressure on Islamabad. Though both nations are equal neighbors bound by Islamic identity and cultural affinities, their bilateral relations have been marked by discord more than harmony.

History testifies that Afghanistan was the only country to oppose Pakistan’s admission into the United Nations in 1947. This opposition stemmed from Kabul’s refusal to accept the Durand Line of 1893 as the legitimate international boundary. The line, drawn by the British between the Emir of Afghanistan and British India, divided tribes and territories, yet it was accepted as binding under international law. Pakistan inherited this boundary at independence, but successive Afghan governments contested it, leading to an undercurrent of hostility. Tensions deepened in 1949 when Afghanistan unilaterally declared that it would no longer recognize the Durand Line agreements, and in 1950 Kabul extended open support to the idea of “Pashtunistan,” fueling secessionist sentiment within Pakistan.

In 1961, relations reached a nadir when Pakistan closed its borders after repeated Afghan-backed incursions. Trade and transit were halted, and diplomatic ties were suspended, resuming only in 1963 after mediation by Iran. Yet the shadow of mistrust never lifted. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979 altered the dynamics altogether. Pakistan became the frontline state in supporting the Afghan resistance, hosting nearly three million Afghan refugees and providing logistic support to the Mujahideen. While Pakistan bore the social, economic, and security burdens of this prolonged conflict, gratitude from Kabul was sparse. Instead, Afghan soil became a theatre for external powers to play out their rivalries, often at the cost of Pakistan’s internal stability.

After the withdrawal of Soviet forces in 1989, the ensuing civil war in Afghanistan once again spilled into Pakistan’s territory. Later, with the emergence of the Taliban in the mid-1990s, Pakistan sought to cultivate ties for the sake of regional stability, yet the post-9/11 U.S. invasion of Afghanistan turned the country into a sanctuary for anti-Pakistan elements. Groups operating across the border conducted guerrilla-style attacks on Pakistani security forces, a bitter reminder that mistrust and conflict continued to dominate relations.

Against this turbulent history, the present regional alignment offers a new dimension. China, through its Belt and Road Initiative and particularly the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), has invested heavily in this region. Beijing, with its pragmatic outlook, cannot afford to see its vast capital sink amidst instability. It has therefore encouraged dialogue under a single table and a single agenda, bringing together Pakistan, Afghanistan, and China with the twin goals of peace and economic cooperation.

In this context, the recent meetings between the foreign ministers of the three countries deserve particular mention. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister has persistently emphasized that durable peace in Afghanistan is indispensable for regional stability and for the security of CPEC projects. His Afghan counterpart, while representing a nation long fractured by internal strife, has expressed willingness to rebuild trust and work towards a future that avoids perpetual hostility with its eastern neighbor. Meanwhile, China’s Foreign Minister has acted as a bridge, urging both sides to focus on connectivity, trade, and counterterrorism as common grounds. These trilateral ministerial dialogues have signaled not only Beijing’s commitment to safeguard its investments but also the possibility of transforming years of mistrust into constructive engagement.

At present, Pakistan finds itself in a rare position of diplomatic advantage. For perhaps the first time in decades, the United States appears to have momentarily stepped out of India’s spell, reassessing the balance of power in South Asia. Afghanistan too, weary of endless internal strife and isolation, has tilted towards China and shown readiness to sit with Pakistan for constructive dialogue. For New Delhi, this signals a gradual erosion of influence in a region it has long sought to dominate by using Kabul as a counterweight to Islamabad. In this grand game of chess, India is facing a losing battle as the board rearranges itself in favor of Pakistan’s regional diplomacy.

The course of history suggests, however, that optimism must be tempered with caution. Pakistan’s relations with Afghanistan have often oscillated between fleeting cooperation and recurring confrontation. While the present moment carries the fragrance of success, it also demands vigilant handling. For Islamabad, this is a test of how adroitly it can translate diplomatic openings into long-term gains. The lessons of history remain clear: goodwill cannot be sustained on rhetoric alone; it requires mechanisms that address core disputes, ensure equitable distribution of economic dividends, and secure borders against infiltration.

Yet the signs are encouraging. The willingness of Afghanistan to engage with Pakistan under China’s facilitation, reinforced through the direct involvement of the three foreign ministers, signals an acknowledgment that old hostilities have led neither to prosperity nor peace. If this trilateral framework succeeds, it will not only stabilize the frontier regions but also unlock the potential of trade routes connecting South Asia, Central Asia, and beyond. For Pakistan, this would mean not just security on its western border but also the prospect of becoming the economic crossroads of the region.

Time will ultimately determine how much Pakistan can benefit from this situation. The challenge is to convert tactical successes into strategic permanence, ensuring that the sacrifices of the past yield dividends for future generations. For now, however, Pakistan stands on firm ground, its flag raised high in regional diplomacy, and the door to a new chapter in its fraught relationship with Afghanistan appears, at long last, to be opening.

Tags: “Pashtunistan"1947Afghan RefugeesAfghan-backed incursionsAfghanistanCentral AsiaChinaChina-Pakistan Economic CorridorCPECIndiaIslamabadKabulMuhammad Mohsin IqbalNew DelhiPak-Afghan-ChinaPakistanSouth AsiaSouth Asia’s strategic chessboardTrilateral diplomacyUNUnited Nations
Previous Post

World’s first commercial CO₂ storage facility opens in Norway

Next Post

Nearly 150,000 evacuated amid flood threat as India releases water into Sutlej, Ravi

Related Posts

The Power of community work: building unity, equality, and lasting harmony 
Opinion

The Power of community work: building unity, equality, and lasting harmony 

By Proffessor Dr. Shehzad Qureshi, London In an increasingly fragmented world, the importance of community work has never been more...

by Sub News
April 5, 2026
March 31 Genocide – A Crime Against Humanity Committed Against Azerbaijanis
Opinion

March 31 genocide – A crime against humanity committed against Azerbaijanis

By Farid Mustafayev Starting from the early 18th century, Armenian nationalists carried out a policy of genocide against the Azerbaijani...

by Sub News
March 30, 2026
Architects of the nation or objects of pity? why the new generation is shunning teaching
Opinion

Architects of the nation or objects of pity? why the new generation is shunning teaching

By: Dr. Muhammad Imran, Department of Education, PMAS-ARID agriculture university Rawalpindi In the upscale cafes of Pakistan’s metropolitan hubs, if...

by Sub News
March 8, 2026
The power to Give to Gain
Opinion

The power to Give to Gain

By Erum Masood, Global Media, Journalist. On this special day, March 8th, we celebrate the incredible women who inspire and...

by Sub News
March 4, 2026
Next Post
Nearly 150,000 evacuated amid flood threat as India releases water into Sutlej, Ravi

Nearly 150,000 evacuated amid flood threat as India releases water into Sutlej, Ravi

Breaking News

  • Pakistan LNG Limited issues first spot LNG tender since 2023 amid supply crunch
  • Naqvi meets US Charge d’Affaires, discusses US-Iran peace talks and regional stability efforts
  • Pakistan rejects India’s ‘baseless allegations’ over Pahalgam incident
  • PSL 11: Rawalpindiz beat Islamabad United to secure first win
  • Global Super League 2026 schedule announced; Lahore Qalandars to open campaign on July 23
Sub News

© 2026 subnewsenglish.com

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Diplomatic
  • Sports
    • Cricket
  • National
  • Business
  • Crime & Justice
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Environment
    • CPEC

© 2026 subnewsenglish.com

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.